SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Predictive and discriminative localization of pathology using high resolution class activation maps with CNNs.

PeerJ Comput Sci · 2021-07-14

DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.622PMID: 34322593

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeExisting class activation mapping (CAM) techniques extract the feature maps only from a single layer of the convolutional neural net (CNN), generally from the final layer and then interpolate to upsample to the original image resolution to locate the discriminative regions. Consequently these provide a coarse localization that may not be able to capture subtle abnormalities in medical images. To alleviate this, our work proposes a technique called high resolution class activation mapping (HR-CAMs) that can provide enhanced visual explainability to the CNN models.MethodsHR-CAMs fuse feature maps by training a network using the input from multiple layers of a trained CNN, thus gaining information from every layer that can localize abnormalities with greater details in original image resolution. The technique is validated qualitatively and quantitatively on a simulated dataset of 8,000 images followed by applications on multiple image analysis tasks that include (1) skin lesion classification (ISIC open dataset-25,331 cases) and (2) predicting bone fractures (MURA open dataset-40,561 images) (3) predicting Parkinson's disease (PD) from neuromelanin sensitive MRI (small cohort-80 subjects).ResultsWe demonstrate that our model creates clinically interpretable subject specific high resolution discriminative localizations when compared to widely used CAMs and Gradient-CAMs.ConclusionHR-CAMs provide finer delineation of abnormalities thus facilitating superior explainability to CNNs as has been demonstrated from its rigorous validation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.