SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cognition, hallucination severity and hallucination-specific insight in neurodegenerative disorders and eye disease.

Cogn Neuropsychiatry · 2021-08-02

DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2021.1960812PMID: 34338592

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Introduction: Hallucinations occur across neurodegenerative disorders, with increasing severity, poorer cognition and impaired hallucination-specific insight associated with worse outcomes and faster disease progression. It remains unclear how changes in cognition, temporal aspects of hallucinations, hallucination-specific insight and distress relate to each other.Methods: Extant samples of patients experiencing visual hallucinations were included in the analyses: Parkinson's Disease (n = 103), Parkinson's Disease Dementia (n = 41), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (n = 27) and Eye Disease (n = 113). We explored the relationship between factors of interest with Spearman's correlations and random-effect linear models.Results: Spearman's correlation analyses at the whole-group level showed that higher hallucination-specific insight was related to higher MMSE score (rs = 0.39, p rs = -0.28, p p p = 0.003), and to VH duration (p = 0.04). Interestingly, insight was linked to the distress component but not the frequency component of severity. No significant relationship was found between MMSE and hallucination severity in these analyses.Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of hallucination-specific insight, distress and duration across groups. A better understanding of the role these factors play in VH may help with the development of future therapeutic interventions trans-diagnostically.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.