NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
AimsThis follow-up study aimed to examine the 8-year efficacy and safety of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in southern China.MethodsThe follow-up data of 10 patients with PD undergoing STN-DBS were analyzed. Motor symptoms were assessed before and 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after the surgery with stimulation-on in both off-medication (off-med) and on-medication (on-med) status using the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Part III. The quality of life was assessed using the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire. The sleep, cognition, and emotion were evaluated using a series of nonmotor scales. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) and stimulation parameters were recorded at each follow-up.ResultsThe motor symptoms were improved by 50.9%, 37.7%, 36.7%, and 37.3% in 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively, in the off-med / stimulation-on status compared with the baseline. The quality of life improved by 39.7% and 56.1% in 1 and 3 years, respectively, but declined to the preoperative level thereafter. The sleep, cognition, and emotion were mostly unchanged. LEDD reduced from 708.1 ± 172.5 mg to 330 ± 207.8 mg in 8 years. The stimulation parameters, including amplitude, pulse width, and frequency, were 2.77 ± 0.49 V, 71.3 ± 12.8 μs, and 121.5 ± 21 Hz, respectively, in 8 years.ConclusionLong-term therapeutic efficacy of STN-DBS could be achieved even with relatively low stimulation intensity and medication dosage for PD patients in southern China. Motor improvement and medication reduction were maintained through the 8-year follow-up, but improvement in quality of life lasted for only 3 years. No definite changes was found in nonmotor symptoms after STN-DBS.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.