SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

[Implementation of an individualized tablet-based training program in the domestic setting following complex treatment of Parkinson's disease-Success factors and barriers].

Nervenarzt · 2021-10-07

DOI: 10.1007/s00115-021-01202-0PMID: 34622319

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundRegular physical activity is of great relevance in Parkinson's disease. As part of the project "Individualized training program for Parkinson's disease patients" (ParkProTrain), a tablet-based program was developed to support individual self-training. It has been tested over a period of 9 months in domestic settings. Patients were asked about the feasibility of use and satisfaction.MethodsPatients who used the program at home following inpatient Parkinson's complex treatment (PCT) were interviewed twice (9 and 36 weeks after PCT).ResultsThe program helped patients to stay motivated throughout the interventional period. It provided them with both structure and flexibility to develop their own training routine. The following were named as positive aspects (success factors), including: the introductory seminars in the clinic, the close supervision during the interventional period, the soundness and Parkinson's specificity, the feasibility and manageability of the program and the individualized training plans; however, patients also provided information on how the program could still be optimized (barriers).DiscussionThe program has already successfully implemented a number of aspects that promote activity. Further recommendations were derived for future use, to which more attention should be paid: Parkinson's specificity and individualization of the program, flexible training in terms of location and time, close and personal support throughout the study period and the technique should be designed to be easy to learn and manage.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.