SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2021-10-20

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308PMID: 34744699

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent a follow-up 1 year after implantation surgery to analyze the correlation between preoperative levodopa impact test results and postoperative Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor score, postoperative PD Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) score, and PDQ-39 improvement. Results: Improvements in QoL were associated with several preoperative characteristics including preoperative UPDRS-III tremor, UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) (p = 0.049), UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) (p = 0.012), Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.012), and PDQ-39 (p = 0.012) before surgery. Multiple linear regression model using preoperative MMSE [odds ratio (OR) = 0.342, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.051-2.297], preoperative UPDRS-III tremor (OR = 2.099, 95% CI = 0.585-7.535), UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) [OR = 1.316, 95% CI = 0.804-2.154, UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.691-1.207], correctly classified 88.5% of patients. Conclusion: Levodopa challenge test results cannot predict the effect of DBS. However, the test can be incorporated into a regression prediction model to the quality of life of PD patients after DBS with other preoperative factors.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.