SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Postural and gait symptoms in de novo Parkinson's disease patients correlate with cholinergic white matter pathology.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2021-11-12

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.11.010PMID: 34784526

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionThe postural instability gait difficulty motor subtype of patients with Parkinson's disease (PIGD-PD) has been associated with more severe cognitive pathology and a higher risk on dementia compared to the tremor-dominant subtype (TD-PD). Here, we investigated whether the microstructural integrity of the cholinergic projections from the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) was different between these clinical subtypes.MethodsDiffusion-weighted imaging data of 98 newly-diagnosed unmedicated PD patients (44 TD-PD and 54 PIGD-PD subjects) and 10 healthy controls, were analysed using diffusion tensor imaging, focusing on the white matter tracts associated with cholinergic projections from the NBM (NBM-WM) as the tract-of-interest. Quantitative tract-based and voxel-based analyses were performed using FA and MD as the estimates of white matter integrity.ResultsVoxel-based analyses indicated significantly lower FA in the frontal part of the medial and lateral NBM-WM tract of both hemispheres of PIGD-PD compared to TD-PD. Relative to healthy control, several clusters with significantly lower FA were observed in the frontolateral NBM-WM tract of both disease groups. Furthermore, significant correlations between the severity of the axial and gait impairment and NBM-WM FA and MD were found, which were partially mediated by NBM-WM state on subjects' attentional performance.ConclusionsThe PIGD-PD subtype shows a loss of microstructural integrity of the NBM-WM tract, which suggests that a loss of cholinergic projections in this PD subtype already presents in de novo PD patients.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.