SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease with SNCA mutations: Based on the follow-up to 10 years.

Brain Behav · 2022-01-18

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2503PMID: 35040589

Open accessresearch-article; Multicenter Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundsAlthough the short-term efficacy of bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been reported in a limited number of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with SNCA mutations, there are no data for long-term outcome.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study investigated previously reported PD patients with SNCA mutations, implanted with bilateral subthalamic DBS. We compared demographic and clinical data at baseline and last follow-up. Clinical data of motor and nonmotor symptoms and motor fluctuation were collected up to 10 years from DBS surgery.ResultsAmong four subjects, three had SNCA duplication and one had c.158C.A (p.A53E) mutation. The mean post-implantation follow-up duration was 5.4 ± 3.7 years. All patients with SNCA duplication showed favorable outcome, although one died from breast cancer 1.5 years after DBS. The patient with the missense mutation became wheelchair-bound due to progressed axial, cognitive and psychiatric symptoms after 3.5 years from DBS despite the benefit on motor fluctuation.ConclusionBased on findings in our small cohort, subthalamic DBS could be beneficial for motor fluctuation in PD patients with SNCA mutations, especially those with SNCA duplication, and cognitive and psychiatric symptoms are important for the long-term outcome of subthalamic DBS.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.