SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Interactions between nuclear and mitochondrial SNPs and Parkinson's disease risk.

Mitochondrion · 2022-02-12

DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2022.02.002PMID: 35167983

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Interactions between the products of the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes are critical for the function of most eukaryotic cells. Recently the introduction of mitochondrial replacement therapy has raised the question of incompatibilities between mitochondrial and nuclear variants, and their potential influence on the genetic makeup of human populations. Such interactions could also contribute to the variability of the penetrance of pathogenic DNA variants. This led us to investigate the frequencies of combinations of nuclear and mitochondrial SNP alleles (mitonuclear combinations) in healthy individuals (n = 5375) and in a cohort of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD, n = 2210). In the unaffected population, we were not able to find associations between nuclear and mitochondrial variants with a false discovery rate below 0.05 after accounting for multiple testing (i.e., the number of combinations examined). However, in the PD cohort, five combinations surpassed this threshold. Next, after combining both cohorts, we investigated whether these associations were modulated by disease status. All five combinations were significant (p -3 for all tests). These combinations also showed significant evidence for an effect of the interaction between the mitochondrial and nuclear variants on disease risk. Their nuclear components mapped to TBCA, NIBAN3, and GLT25D1 and an uncharacterised intergenic region. In summary, starting from a single cohort design we identified combinations of nuclear and mitochondrial variants affecting PD disease risk.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.