NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Levodopa (L-Dopa) is considered to be one of the most effective therapies available for Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. The therapeutic window of L-Dopa is narrow due to its short half-life, and long-time L-Dopa treatment will cause some side effects such as dyskinesias, psychosis, and orthostatic hypotension. Therefore, it is of great significance to monitor the dynamic concentration of L-Dopa for PD patients with wearable biosensors to reduce the risk of complications. However, the high concentration of interferents in the body brings great challenges to the in vivo monitoring of L-Dopa. To address this issue, we proposed a minimal-invasive L-Dopa biosensor based on a flexible differential microneedle array (FDMA). One working electrode responded to L-Dopa and interfering substances, while the other working electrode only responded to electroactive interferences. The differential current response of these two electrodes was related to the concentration of L-Dopa by eliminating the common mode interference. The differential structure provided the sensor with excellent anti-interference performance and improved the sensor's accuracy. This novel flexible microneedle sensor exhibited favorable analytical performance of a wide linear dynamic range (0-20 μM), high sensitivity (12.618 nA μM-1 cm-2) as well as long-term stability (two weeks). Ultimately, the L-Dopa sensor displayed a fast response to in vivo L-Dopa dynamically with considerable anti-interference ability. All these attractive performances indicated the feasibility of this FDMA for minimal invasive and continuous monitoring of L-Dopa dynamic concentration for Parkinson's disease.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.