SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Resting-state electroencephalography based deep-learning for the detection of Parkinson's disease.

PLoS One · 2022-02-24

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263159PMID: 35202420

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most serious and challenging neurodegenerative disorders to diagnose. Clinical diagnosis on observing motor symptoms is the gold standard, yet by this point nerve cells are degenerated resulting in a lower efficacy of therapeutic treatments. In this study, we introduce a deep-learning approach based on a recently-proposed 20-Layer Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) applied on the visual realization of the Wavelet domain of a resting-state EEG. The proposed approach was able to efficiently and accurately detect PD as well as distinguish subjects with PD on medications from subjects who are off medication. The gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to visualize the features based on which the approach provided the predictions. A significantly high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and Weighted Kappa Score up to 99.9% were achieved and the visualization of the regions in the Wavelet images that contributed to the deep-learning approach decisions was provided. The proposed framework can then serve as an effective computer-aided diagnostic tool that will support physicians and scientists in further understanding the nature of PD and providing an objective and confident opinion regarding the clinical diagnosis of the disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.