Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
In positron emission tomography (PET), 68Ge-transmission scanning is considered the gold standard in attenuation correction (AC) though not available in current dual imaging systems. In this experimental study we evaluated a novel AC method for PET/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging which is essentially based on a composite database of multiple 68Ge-transmission maps and T1-weighted (T1w) MR image-pairs (composite transmission, CTR-AC). This proof-of-concept study used retrospectively a database with 125 pairs of co-registered 68Ge-AC maps and T1w MR images from anatomical normal subjects and a validation dataset comprising dynamic [11C]PE2I PET data from nine patients with Parkinsonism. CTR-AC maps were generated by non-rigid image registration of all database T1w MRI to each subject's T1w, applying the same transformation to every 68Ge-AC map, and averaging the resulting 68Ge-AC maps. [11C]PE2I PET images were reconstructed using CTR-AC and a patient-specific 68Ge-AC map as the reference standard. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and quantitative parameters of kinetic analysis were compared, i.e., relative delivery (R1) and non-displaceable binding potential (BPND). CTR-AC showed high accuracy for whole-brain SUV (mean %bias ± SD: 0.5 ± 3.5%), whole-brain R1 (-0.1 ± 3.2%), and putamen BPND (3.7 ± 8.1%). SUV and R1 precision (SD of %bias) were modest and lowest in the anterior cortex, with an R1 %bias of -1.1 ± 6.4%). The prototype CTR-AC is capable of providing accurate MRAC-maps with continuous linear attenuation coefficients though still experimental. The method's accuracy is comparable to the best MRAC methods published so far, both in SUV and as found for ZTE-AC in quantitative parameters of kinetic modelling.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.