SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Parkinson's Disease: An Orthostatic Hypotension Analysis.

Front Neurol · 2022-03-18

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.811698PMID: 35370873

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is an early non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the underlying mechanism of hemodynamic changes in patients with PD and OH remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the dynamic cerebral autoregulation changes in patients with PD with OH. Ninety patients with PD and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. The patients' non-invasive blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow velocity were simultaneously recorded at supine and orthostatic positions during the active standing test (AST). Transfer function analysis was used to determine autoregulatory parameters including gain [i.e., damping effect of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) on the magnitude of BP oscillation] and phase difference (i.e., the time delay of the cerebral blood flow response to BP). Sixteen patients (17.8%) in the PD population were diagnosed with OH (PD-OH). The AST results were normal for 74 patients (82.2%) (PD-NOR). In the supine position, the PD-OH group had a lower phase degree than the PD-NOR group (50.3 ± 23.4 vs. 72.6 ± 32.2 vs. 68.9 ± 12.1, p = 0.020); however, no significant difference was found upon comparing with the HC group. In the orthostatic position, the normalized gain was significantly higher for the symptomatic OH group than for the asymptomatic OH group and HC group (1.50 ± 0.58 vs. 0.97 ± 0.29 vs. 1.10 ± 0.31, p = 0.019). A symptomatic OH in the PD population indicates an impaired cerebral autoregulation ability in the orthostatic position. Cerebral autoregulation tends to be impaired in the supine position in the OH population.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.