SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Does Prefrontal Glutamate Index Cognitive Changes in Parkinson's Disease?

Front Hum Neurosci · 2022-04-12

DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.809905PMID: 35496064

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionCognitive impairment is a highly prevalent non-motor feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology may help in identifying therapeutic targets to prevent or treat dementia. This study sought to identify metabolic alterations in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), a key region for cognitive functioning that has been implicated in cognitive dysfunction in PD.MethodsProton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy was used to investigate metabolic changes in the PFC of a cohort of cognitively normal individuals without PD (CTL), as well as PD participants with either normal cognition (PD-NC), mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), or dementia (PDD). Ratios to Creatine (Cre) resonance were obtained for glutamate (Glu), glutamine and glutamate combined (Glx), N-acetylaspartate (NAA), myoinositol (mI), and total choline (Cho), and correlated with cognitive scores across multiple domains (executive function, learning and memory, language, attention, visuospatial function, and global cognition) administered to the PD participants only.ResultsWhen individuals retain cognitive capabilities, the presence of Parkinson's disease does not create metabolic disturbances in the PFC. However, when cognitive symptoms are present, PFC Glu/Cre ratios decrease with significant differences between the PD-NC and PPD groups. In addition, Glu/Cre ratios and memory scores were marginally associated, but not after Bonferroni correction.ConclusionThese preliminary findings indicate that fluctuations in prefrontal glutamate may constitute a biomarker for the progression of cognitive impairments in PD. We caution for larger MRS investigations of carefully defined PD groups.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.