SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Monocyte biomarkers define sargramostim treatment outcomes for Parkinson's disease.

Clin Transl Med · 2022-07-01

DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.958PMID: 35802825

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundDysregulation of innate and adaptive immunity heralds both the development and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). Deficits in innate immunity in PD are defined by impairments in monocyte activation, function, and pro-inflammatory secretory factors. Each influences disease pathobiology.Methods and resultsTo define monocyte biomarkers associated with immune transformative therapy for PD, changes in gene and protein expression were evaluated before and during treatment with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, sargramostim, Leukine® ). Monocytes were recovered after leukapheresis and isolation by centrifugal elutriation, before and 2 and 6 months after initiation of treatment. Transcriptome and proteome biomarkers were scored against clinical motor functions. Pathway enrichments from single cell-RNA sequencing and proteomic analyses from sargramostim-treated PD patients demonstrate a neuroprotective signature, including, but not limited to, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and autophagy genes and proteins (LRRK2, HMOX1, TLR2, TLR8, RELA, ATG7, and GABARAPL2).ConclusionsThis monocyte profile provides an "early" and unique biomarker strategy to track clinical immune-based interventions, but requiring validation in larger case studies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.