SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Objective Observer vs. Patient Motor State Assessments Using the PD Home Diary in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

Front Neurol · 2022-07-12

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.935664PMID: 35903114

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe Parkinson Disease (PD) Home Diary (HD) is a commonly used clinical outcome measure, but it has not been extensively compared to direct assessments by experienced observers.ObjectiveValidation of patient-reported HD by investigating the agreement between motor state assessments by patients and observers.MethodsThis observational study included patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Observers were physicians or research nurses. Patients completed a screening visit, one day of diary ratings at home, and then two days of ratings on-site during which patients and observers simultaneously judged the participants' motor state.ResultsObservers and 40 patients completed 1,288 pairs of half-hourly blinded motor state assessments. There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings (P ConclusionThere were significant differences between observer and patient ratings. Patients and observers generally agreed on when the patients was in the "On" state (with or without dyskinesia). Patient ratings on the hour level seem to be influenced by other aspects of the patients' experience than the observed motor state, but assessment of daily time spent in the different motor state provides reasonable reliability.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.