SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Decreased soluble Nogo-B in serum as a promising biomarker for Parkinson's disease.

Front Neurosci · 2022-07-26

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.894454PMID: 35958994

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundRecently, the neurite outgrowth inhibitor-B (Nogo-B) receptor has been reported as a novel candidate gene for Parkinson's disease (PD). Nogo-B receptors need to combine with soluble Nogo-B to exert their physiological function. However, little is known about the relationship between serum soluble Nogo-B and PD.MethodsSerum levels of sNogo-B and α-Synuclein (α-Syn) were measured in a cohort of 53 patients with PD and 49 healthy controls with the ELISA kit method.ResultsSerum sNogo-B level is significantly lower in the PD group than that in healthy controls and is negatively correlated with UPDRS-III score (p = 0.049), H&Y stage (p = 0.0108) as well as serum α-Syn level (p = 0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) of serum sNogo-B in differentiating patients with PD from controls was 0.801 while the AUC of serum α-Syn was 0.93. Combining serum sNogo-B and α-Syn in differentiating patients with PD from HC presented higher discriminatory potential (AUC = 0.9534).ConclusionDecreased serum sNogo-B may be a potential biomarker for PD. Lower Nogo-B level reflects worse motor function and disease progression of PD. Serum sNogo-B is of added value to serum α-Syn panel in distinguishing PD from controls. Future studies are needed to confirm in larger samples and different populations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.