SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Increased PRR14 and VCAM-1 level in serum of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Front Neurol · 2022-09-30

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.993940PMID: 36247752

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundRegarding the complexity of Parkinson's disease (PD), the identification of reliable biomarkers is of great significance for improving the accuracy of diagnosis and monitoring disease progression. Recently, some studies suggested that serum proline-rich protein 14 (PRR14), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and soluble CD163 (sCD163) factors may be associated with PD, even as potential biomarkers. However, the role of these serum factors is still unclear.ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore the alterations of serum PRR14, VCAM-1, and sCD163 levels during PD progression, and their association with disease-related variables of PD.MethodsWe performed the assessment of scale tests and the detection of serum samples in patients with PD (n = 100) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 100). Furthermore, we investigated the association between serum factors and sex, cognitive impairments, H&Y (Hohn and Yahr), age at onset (AAO), and other variables in patients with PD.ResultsPatients with PD exhibited increased PRR14 and VCAM-1 serum levels compared with HCs. No significant differences were found in serum levels of sCD163. Subgroup analysis uncovered increased VCAM-1 in the female and male subgroups (PD and HCs). Among patients with PD, decreased PRR14 and increased VCAM-1 were associated with severer cognitive impairments and severer PD (H&Y), respectively. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed that there was a positive correlation between VCAM-1 and AAO.ConclusionsIncreased serum levels of PRR14 and VCAM-1 suggest that inflammation and defective autophagy may play vital roles in the pathogenesis of PD. However, the potential mechanisms remain to be elucidated.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.