NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundSubthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is regarded as an effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinical benefit, however, varies significantly across patients. Lead location has been hypothesized to play a critical role in determining motor outcome and may account for much of the observed variability reported among patients.ObjectiveTo retrospectively evaluate the relationship of lead location to motor outcomes in patients who had been implanted previously at another center by employing a novel visualization technology that more precisely determines the location of the DBS lead and its contacts with respect to each patient's individually defined STN.MethodsAnatomical models were generated using novel imaging in 40 PD patients who had undergone bilateral STN DBS (80 electrodes) at another center. Patient-specific models of each STN were evaluated to determine DBS electrode contact locations with respect to anterior to posterior and medial to lateral regions of the individualized STNs and compared to the change in the contralateral hemi-body Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) motor score.ResultsThe greatest improvement in hemi-body motor function was found when active contacts were located within the posterolateral portion of the STN (71.5%). Motor benefit was 52 and 36% for central and anterior segments, respectively. Active contacts within the posterolateral portion also demonstrated the greatest reduction in levodopa dosage (77%).ConclusionThe degree of motor benefit was dependent on the location of the stimulating contact within the STN. Although other factors may play a role, we provide further evidence in support of the hypothesis that lead location is a critical factor in determining clinical outcomes in STN DBS.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.