SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Transcriptional targets of senataxin and E2 promoter binding factors are associated with neuro-degenerative pathways during increased autophagic flux.

Sci Rep · 2022-10-21

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21617-2PMID: 36271102

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Autophagy is an intracellular recycling process that degrades harmful molecules and enables survival during starvation, with implications for diseases including dementia, cancer and atherosclerosis. Previous studies demonstrate how a limited number of transcription factors (TFs) can increase autophagy. However, this knowledge has not resulted in translation into therapy, thus, to gain understanding of more suitable targets, we utilized a systems biology approach. We induced autophagy by amino acid starvation and mTOR inhibition in HeLa, HEK 293 and SH-SY5Y cells and measured temporal gene expression using RNA-seq. We observed 456 differentially expressed genes due to starvation and 285 genes due to mTOR inhibition (PFDR FDR ≤ 0.024 in SH-SY5Y and HeLa) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, PFDR FDR ≤ 0.04). In the SH-SY5Y cells of neuronal origin, the E2F transcription family was predicted to activate Alzheimer's disease pathway (PFDR ≤ 0.0065). These exploratory analyses suggest that SETX and E2F may mediate transcriptional regulation of autophagy and further investigations into their possible role in neuro-degeneration are warranted.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.