Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is considered the gold-standard treatment for PD; however, underlying therapeutic mechanisms need to be comprehensively elucidated, especially in relation to glial cells. We aimed to understand the effects of STN-microlesions and STN-DBS on striatal glial cells, inflammation, and extracellular glutamate/GABAergic concentration in a 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced PD rat model. Rats with unilateral striatal 6-OHDA and electrodes implanted in the STN were divided into two groups: DBS OFF and DBS ON (5 days/2 h/day). Saline and 6-OHDA animals were used as control. Akinesia, striatal reactivity for astrocytes, microglia, and inflammasome, and expression of cytokines, cell signaling, and excitatory amino acid transporter (EAAT)-2 were examined. Moreover, striatal microdialysis was performed to evaluate glutamate and GABA concentrations. The PD rat model exhibited akinesia, increased inflammation, glutamate release, and decreased glutamatergic clearance in the striatum. STN-DBS (DBS ON) completely abolished akinesia. Both STN-microlesion and STN-DBS decreased striatal cytokine expression and the relative concentration of extracellular glutamate. However, STN-DBS inhibited morphological changes in astrocytes, decreased inflammasome reactivity, and increased EAAT2 expression in the striatum. Collectively, these findings suggest that the beneficial effects of DBS are mediated by a combination of stimulation and local microlesions, both involving the inhibition of glial cell activation, neuroinflammation, and glutamate excitotoxicity.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.