SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Use of common spatial patterns for early detection of Parkinson's disease.

Sci Rep · 2022-11-05

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23247-0PMID: 36335198

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

One of the most common diseases that affects human brain is Parkinson's disease. Detection of Parkinson's disease (PD) poses a serious challenge. Robust methods for feature extraction allowing separation between the electroencephalograms (EEG) of healthy subjects and PD patients are required. We used the EEG records of healthy subjects and PD patients which were subject to auditory tasks. We used the common spatial patterns (CSP) and Laplacian mask as methods to allow robust selection and extraction of features. We used the derived CSP whitening matrix to determine those channels that are the most promising in the terms of differentiating between EEGs of healthy controls and of PD patients. Using the selection of features calculated using the CSP we managed to obtain the classification accuracy of 85% when classifying EEG records belonging to groups of controls or PD patients. Using the features calculated using the Laplacian operator we obtained the classification accuracy of 90%. Diagnosing the PD in early stages using EEG is possible. The CSP proved to be a promising technique to detect informative channels and to separate between the groups. Use of the combination of features calculated using the Laplacian offers good separability between the two groups.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.