SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

An in vivo assay to study locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans.

MethodsX · 2022-10-25

DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101890PMID: 36353356

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Adaptation in the sensory-mechanical loop during locomotion is a powerful mechanism that allows organisms to survive in different conditions and environments. Motile animals need to alter motion patterns in different environments. For example, crocodiles and other animals can walk on solid ground but switch to swimming in water beds. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans also shows adaptability by employing thrashing behaviour in low viscosity media and crawling in high viscosity media. The mechanism that enables this adaptability is an active area of research. It has been attributed previously to neuro-modulation by dopamine and serotonin. This study introduces an experimental assay to physiologically investigate the neuronal mechanisms of modulation of locomotion by dopamine. The technique is utilized to test gait switching while imaging the mechanosensory dopaminergic neurons PDE. Results revealed their role to be not limited to touch sensation, but to sensing surrounding environment resistance as well. The significance of such characterization is improving our understanding of dopamine gait switching which gets impaired in Parkinson's disease.-A locomotion pattern switching system was devised to allow studying this process in vivo in the nematode C. elegans.-This system allowed the study of dopaminergic neurons PDE response as the worms switched from crawling to swimming.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.