Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Parkinson's disease (PD) has a characteristically unilateral pattern of symptoms at onset and in the early stages; this lateralization is considered a diagnostically important diagnosis feature. We aimed to compare the graph-theoretical properties of whole-brain networks generated by using resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and the resting-state-informed structural connectome (rsSC) in patients with left-onset PD (LPD), right-onset PD (RPD), and healthy controls (HCs). We recruited 26 patients with PD (13 with LPD and 13 with RPD) as well as 13 age- and sex-matched HCs. Rs-fMRI and DTI were performed in all subjects. Graph-theoretical analysis was used to calculate the local and global efficiency of a whole-brain network generated by rs-fMRI, DTI, and rsSC. Two-sample t-tests and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. Significantly decreased global and local efficiency were revealed specifically in LPD patients compared with HCs when the rsSC network was used; no significant intergroup difference was found by using rs-fMRI or DTI alone. For rsSC network analysis, multiple network metrics were found to be abnormal in LPD. The degree centrality of the left precuneus was significantly correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score and disease duration (p = 0.030, r = 0.599; p = 0.037, r = 0.582). The topological properties of motor-related brain networks can differentiate LPD and RPD. Nodal metrics may serve as important structural features for PD diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression. Collectively, these findings may provide neurobiological insights into the lateralization of PD onset.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.