SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Onset and mortality of Parkinson's disease in relation to type II diabetes.

J Neurol · 2022-11-27

DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11496-yPMID: 36436068

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesThere is growing evidence that Parkinson's disease and diabetes are partially related diseases; however, the association between the two, and the impact of specific treatments, are still unclear. We evaluated the effect of T2D and antidiabetic treatment on age at PD onset and on all-cause mortality.Research design and methodsThe standardized rate of T2D was calculated for PD patients using the direct method and compared with subjects with essential tremor (ET) and the general Italian population. Age at onset and survival were also compared between patients without T2D (PD-noT2D), patients who developed T2D before PD onset (PD-preT2D) and patients who developed T2D after PD onset (PD-postT2D).ResultsWe designed a retrospective and prospective study. The T2D standardized ratio of PD (N = 8380) and ET (N = 1032) patients was 3.8% and 6.1%, respectively, while in the Italian general population, the overall prevalence was 5.3%. In PD-preT2D patients, on antidiabetic treatment, the onset of PD was associated with a + 6.2 year delay (p ConclusionsT2D, treated with any antidiabetic therapy before PD, is associated with a delay in its onset. Duration of diabetes increases mortality in PD-preT2D, but not in PD-postT2D. These findings prompt further studies on antidiabetic drugs as a potential disease-modifying therapy for PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.