SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Automated measurement of inter-arytenoid distance on 4D laryngeal CT: A validation study.

PLoS One · 2023-01-18

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279927PMID: 36652423

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Changes to the voice are prevalent and occur early in Parkinson's disease. Correlates of these voice changes on four-dimensional laryngeal computed-tomography imaging, such as the inter-arytenoid distance, are promising biomarkers of the disease's presence and severity. However, manual measurement of the inter-arytenoid distance is a laborious process, limiting its feasibility in large-scale research and clinical settings. Automated methods of measurement provide a solution. Here, we present a machine-learning module which determines the inter-arytenoid distance in an automated manner. We obtained automated inter-arytenoid distance readings on imaging from participants with Parkinson's disease as well as healthy controls, and then validated these against manually derived estimates. On a modified Bland-Altman analysis, we found a mean bias of 1.52 mm (95% limits of agreement -1.7 to 4.7 mm) between the automated and manual techniques, which improves to a mean bias of 0.52 mm (95% limits of agreement -1.9 to 2.9 mm) when variability due to differences in slice selection between the automated and manual methods are removed. Our results demonstrate that estimates of the inter-arytenoid distance with our automated machine-learning module are accurate, and represents a promising tool to be utilized in future work studying the laryngeal changes in Parkinson's disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.