SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Evoked resonant neural activity in subthalamic local field potentials reflects basal ganglia network dynamics.

Neurobiol Dis · 2023-01-24

DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106019PMID: 36706929

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA) is induced by subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) and was recently suggested as a marker of lead placement and contact selection in Parkinson's disease. Yet, its underlying mechanisms and how it is modulated by stimulation parameters are unclear. Here, we recorded local field potentials from 27 Parkinson's disease patients, while leads were externalised to scrutinise the ERNA. First, we show that ERNA in the time series waveform and spectrogram likely represent the same activity, which was contested before. Second, our results show that the ERNA has fast and slow dynamics during stimulation, consistent with the synaptic failure hypothesis. Third, we show that ERNA parameters are modulated by different DBS frequencies, intensities, medication states and stimulation modes (continuous DBS vs. adaptive DBS). These results suggest the ERNA might prove useful as a predictor of the best DBS frequency and lowest effective intensity in addition to contact selection. Changes with levodopa and DBS mode suggest that the ERNA may indicate the state of the cortico-basal ganglia circuit making it a putative biomarker to track clinical state in adaptive DBS.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.