SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Interactions across emotional, cognitive and subcortical motor networks underlying freezing of gait.

Neuroimage Clin · 2023-02-02

DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103342PMID: 36739790

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a gait disorder affecting patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and related disorders. The pathophysiology of FOG is unclear because of its phenomenological complexity involving motor, cognitive, and emotional aspects of behavior. Here we used resting-state functional MRI to retrieve functional connectivity (FC) correlated with the New FOG questionnaire (NFOGQ) reflecting severity of FOG in 67 patients with PD. NFOGQ scores were correlated with FCs in the extended basal ganglia network (BGN) involving the striatum and amygdala, and in the extra-cerebellum network (CBLN) involving the frontoparietal network (FPN). These FCs represented interactions across the emotional (amygdala), subcortical motor (BGN and CBLN), and cognitive networks (FPN). Using these FCs as features, we constructed statistical models that explained 40% of the inter-individual variances of FOG severity and that discriminated between PD patients with and without FOG. The amygdala, which connects to the subcortical motor (BGN and CBLN) and cognitive (FPN) networks, may have a pivotal role in interactions across the emotional, cognitive, and subcortical motor networks. Future refinement of the machine learning-based classifier using FCs may clarify the complex pathophysiology of FOG further and help diagnose and evaluate FOG in clinical settings.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.