SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association of 7-Day Profiles of Motor Activity in Marital Dyads with One Component Affected by Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel) · 2023-01-17

DOI: 10.3390/s23031087PMID: 36772127

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

(1) Background: A noticeable association between the motor activity (MA) profiles of persons living together has been found in previous studies. Social actigraphy methods have shown that this association, in marital dyads composed of healthy individuals, is greater than that of a single person compared to itself. This study aims at verifying the association of MA profiles in dyads where one component is affected by Parkinson's disease (PD). (2) Methods: Using a wearable sensor-based social actigraphy approach, we continuously monitored, for 7 days, the activities of 27 marital dyads including one component with PD. (3) Results: The association of motor activity profiles within a marital dyad (cross-correlation coefficient 0.344) is comparable to the association of any participant with themselves (0.325). However, when considering the disease severity quantified by the UPDRS III score, it turns out that the less severe the symptoms, the more associated are the MA profiles. (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PD treatment could be improved by leveraging the MA of the healthy spouse, thus promoting lifestyles also beneficial for the component affected by PD. The actigraphy approach provided valuable information on habitual functions and motor fluctuations, and could be useful in investigating the response to treatment.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.