SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

PA-Tran: Learning to Estimate 3D Hand Pose with Partial Annotation.

Sensors (Basel) · 2023-01-31

DOI: 10.3390/s23031555PMID: 36772595

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

This paper tackles a novel and challenging problem-3D hand pose estimation (HPE) from a single RGB image using partial annotation. Most HPE methods ignore the fact that the keypoints could be partially visible (e.g., under occlusions). In contrast, we propose a deep-learning framework, PA-Tran, that jointly estimates the keypoints status and 3D hand pose from a single RGB image with two dependent branches. The regression branch consists of a Transformer encoder which is trained to predict a set of target keypoints, given an input set of status, position, and visual features embedding from a convolutional neural network (CNN); the classification branch adopts a CNN for estimating the keypoints status. One key idea of PA-Tran is a selective mask training (SMT) objective that uses a binary encoding scheme to represent the status of the keypoints as observed or unobserved during training. In addition, by explicitly encoding the label status (observed/unobserved), the proposed PA-Tran can efficiently handle the condition when only partial annotation is available. Investigating the annotation percentage ranging from 50-100%, we show that training with partial annotation is more efficient (e.g., achieving the best 6.0 PA-MPJPE when using about 85% annotations). Moreover, we provide two new datasets. APDM-Hand, is for synthetic hands with APDM sensor accessories, which is designed for a specific hand task. PD-APDM-Hand, is a real hand dataset collected from Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients with partial annotation. The proposed PA-Tran can achieve higher estimation accuracy when evaluated on both proposed datasets and a more general hand dataset.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.