SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Copper Induces Cognitive Impairment in Mice via Modulation of Cuproptosis and CREB Signaling.

Nutrients · 2023-02-15

DOI: 10.3390/nu15040972PMID: 36839332

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

It has been reported that disordered Cu metabolism is associated with several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear. In this study, 4-week-old male mice were exposed to Cu by free-drinking water for three months. Then, the effects of Cu on cognitive functions in mice were tested by Morris water maze tests, and the potential mechanisms were investigated by the ELISA, immunochemistry, TUNEL, and Western blot tests. It was found that Cu exacerbates learning and memory impairment, and leads to Cu-overload in the brain and urine of mice. The results showed that Cu induces neuronal degeneration and oxidative damage, promotes the expression of apoptosis-related protein Bax, cuproptosis-related proteins FDX1 and DLAT and the proteotoxic stress marker HSP70, and decreases Fe-S cluster proteins. In addition, Cu affects the pre-synaptic and post-synaptic regulatory mechanisms through inhibiting the expression of PSD-95 and SYP. Cu also suppresses phosphorylation levels in CREB and decreases the expression of BDNF and TrkB in the mouse hippocampus. In conclusion, Cu might mediate cuproptosis, damage synaptic plasticity and inhibit the CREB/BDNF pathway to cause cognitive dysfunction in mice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.