SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Longitudinal cognitive changes in patients with early Parkinson's disease and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2023-03-16

DOI: 10.1111/cns.14173PMID: 36924300

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

AimsIn this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) on the rate of cognitive decline for both global cognition and specific cognitive domains in a cohort of patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI).MethodProspectively longitudinal data were obtained from the PPMI cohort. NPS, including depression, anxiety, apathy, psychosis, impulse control disorders (ICDs), and cognition ability, were evaluated by a series of questionnaires. Linear mixed-effects models were used to investigate the relationship between NPS and the rate of cognitive decline. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to investigate the relationship between NPS and the occurrence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).ResultsIn total, 423 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were recruited at baseline and 395, 378, 366, 346, and 315 participants were followed up at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Depression, anxiety, apathy, and psychosis were associated with global cognitive decline. Except for those with ICDs, patients with psychosis, depression, anxiety, and apathy were more likely to meet the criteria for MCI. Patients with depression and anxiety showed a progressive decline in four major cognitive domains. Apathy and ICDs were separately associated with a progressive decline in processing speed-attention and memory, respectively.ConclusionsNeuropsychiatric symptoms, including psychosis, depression, anxiety, and apathy, could be used to predict future cognitive decline in patients with PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.