SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Model of Gait Control in Parkinson's Disease and Prediction of Robotic Assistance.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng · 2023-02-24

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3245286PMID: 37022872

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Gait variability of healthy adults exhibits Long-Range Autocorrelations (LRA), meaning that the stride interval at any time statistically depends on previous gait cycles; and this dependency spans over several hundreds of strides. Previous works have shown that this property is altered in patients with Parkinson's disease, such that their gait pattern corresponds to a more random process. Here, we adapted a model of gait control to interpret the reduction in LRA that characterized patients in a computational framework. Gait regulation was modeled as a Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian control problem where the objective was to maintain a fixed velocity through the coordinated regulation of stride duration and length. This objective offers a degree of redundancy in the way the controller can maintain a given velocity, resulting in the emergence of LRA. In this framework, the model suggested that patients exploited less the task redundancy, likely to compensate for an increased stride-to-stride variability. Furthermore, we used this model to predict the potential benefit of an active orthosis on the gait pattern of patients. The orthosis was embedded in the model as a low-pass filter on the series of stride parameters. We show in simulations that, with a suitable level of assistance, the orthosis could help patients recovering a gait pattern with LRA comparable to that of healthy controls. Assuming that the presence of LRA in a stride series is a marker of healthy gait control, our study provides a rationale for developing gait assistance technology to reduce the fall risk associated with Parkinson's disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.