SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Static-Dynamic Temporal Networks for Parkinson's Disease Detection and Severity Prediction.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng · 2023-05-10

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3269569PMID: 37093723

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Most patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have different degrees of movement disorders, and effective gait analysis has a huge potential for uncovering hidden gait patterns to achieve the diagnosis of patients with PD. In this paper, the Static-Dynamic temporal networks are proposed for gait analysis. Our model involves a Static temporal pathway and a Dynamic temporal pathway. In the Static temporal pathway, the time series information of each sensor is processed independently with a parallel one-dimension convolutional neural network (1D-Convnet) to extract respective depth features. In the Dynamic temporal pathway, the stitched surface of the feet is deemed to be an irregular "image", and the transfer of the force points at all levels on the sole is regarded as the "optical flow." Then, the motion information of the force points at all levels is extracted by 16 parallel two-dimension convolutional neural network (2D-Convnet) independently. The results show that the Static-Dynamic temporal networks achieved better performance in gait detection of PD patients than other previous methods. Among them, the accuracy of PD diagnosis reached 96.7%, and the accuracy of severity prediction of PD reached 92.3%.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.