SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Shaping the course of early-onset Parkinson's disease: insights from a longitudinal cohort.

Neurol Sci · 2023-05-04

DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06826-5PMID: 37140831

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionEarly -onset Parkinson's disease (EOPD) labels those cases with onset earlier than fifty. Although peculiarities emerged either in clinical or pathological features, EOPD is managed alike typical, late-onset PD. A customized approach would be, instead, better appropriate. Accordingly, a deeper characterization of the clinical course, with an estimation of the disease progression rate, the therapy flow, and the main motor and non-motor complications occurrence, is needed.MethodsA longitudinal cohort of 193 EOPD patients (selected on a single-centre population of 2000 PD cases) was retrospectively analysed, providing descriptive statics on a series of clinical parameters (genetics, phenotype, comorbidities, therapies, motor and non-motor complications, marital and gender issues) and modelling the trajectories from diagnosis to 10 years later of both Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD).ResultsEOPD had a prevalence of 9.7%, including few monogenic cases. It mostly appeared as a motor syndrome, with asymmetric, rigid-akinetic presentation. H&Y linearly progressed with an increment of 0.92 points/10 years; LEDD flow had a non-linear trend, increasing of 526.90 mg/day in 0-5 years, and 166.83 mg/day in 5-10 years. Motor fluctuations started 6.5 ± 3.2 years from onset, affecting up to 80% of the cohort. Neuropsychiatric troubles interested the 50%, sexual complaints the 12%. Gender-specific motor disturbances emerged.ConclusionWe shaped EOPD course, modelling a "brain-first" PD subtype, slowly progressive, with non-linear dopaminergic requirement. Major burden mostly resulted from motor fluctuations, neuropsychiatric complications, sexual and marital complaints, with a considerable gender-effect.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.