Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Protein aggregation is implicated in multiple diseases, so-called proteinopathies, ranging from neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease (PD) to type 2 diabetes mellitus and sickle cell disease (SCD). The structure of the protein aggregates and the kinetics and mechanisms of aggregation have been the object of intense research over the years toward the development of therapeutic routes, including the design of aggregation inhibitors. Nonetheless, the rational design of drugs targeting aggregation inhibition remains a challenging endeavor because of multiple, disease-specific factors, including an incomplete understanding of protein function, the multitude of toxic and non-toxic protein aggregates, the lack of specific drug binding targets, discrepant action mechanisms of aggregation inhibitors, or a low selectivity, specificity, and/or drug potency, reflected in the high concentrations required for some inhibitors to be effective. Herein, we provide a perspective of this therapeutic route with emphasis on small molecules and peptide-based drugs in two diverse diseases, PD and SCD, aiming at establishing links among proposed aggregation inhibitors. The small and large length-scale regimes of the hydrophobic effect are discussed in light of the importance of hydrophobic interactions in proteinopathies. Some simulation results are reported on model peptides, illustrating the impact of hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups in water's hydrogen-bond network with an impact on drug binding. The seeming importance of aromatic rings and hydroxyl groups in protein-aggregation-inhibitor-drugs is emphasized along with the challenges associated with some inhibitors, limiting their development into effective therapeutic options, and questioning the potential of this therapeutic route.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.