SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The reconfiguration pattern of individual brain metabolic connectome for Parkinson's disease identification.

MedComm (2020) · 2023-06-27

DOI: 10.1002/mco2.305PMID: 37388240

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is widely employed to reveal metabolic abnormalities linked to Parkinson's disease (PD) at a systemic level. However, the individual metabolic connectome details with PD based on 18F-FDG PET remain largely unknown. To alleviate this issue, we derived a novel brain network estimation method for individual metabolic connectome, that is, Jensen-Shannon Divergence Similarity Estimation (JSSE). Further, intergroup difference between the individual's metabolic brain network and its global/local graph metrics was analyzed to investigate the metabolic connectome's alterations. To further improve the PD diagnosis performance, multiple kernel support vector machine (MKSVM) is conducted for identifying PD from normal control (NC), which combines both topological metrics and connection. Resultantly, PD individuals showed higher nodal topological properties (including assortativity, modularity score, and characteristic path length) than NC individuals, whereas global efficiency and synchronization were lower. Moreover, 45 most significant connections were affected. Further, consensus connections in occipital, parietal, and frontal regions were decrease in PD while increase in subcortical, temporal, and prefrontal regions. The abnormal metabolic network measurements depicted an ideal classification in identifying PD of NC with an accuracy up to 91.84%. The JSSE method identified the individual-level metabolic connectome of 18F-FDG PET, providing more dimensional and systematic mechanism insights for PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.