NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Synaptic density in the central nervous system can be measured in vivo using PET with [18F]SynVesT-1. While [18F]SynVesT-1 has been proven to be a powerful radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), its currently validated acquisition and quantification protocols are invasive and technically challenging in these populations due to the arterial sampling and relatively long scanning times. The objectives of this work were to evaluate a noninvasive (reference tissue) quantification method for [18F]SynVesT-1 in PD patients and to determine the minimum scan time necessary for accurate quantification. [18F]SynVesT-1 PET scans were acquired in 5 patients with PD and 3 healthy control subjects for 120 min with arterial blood sampling. Quantification was performed using the one-tissue compartment model (1TCM) with arterial input function, as well as with the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) to estimate binding potential (BPND) using centrum semiovale (CS) as a reference region. The SRTM2 method was used with k2' fixed to either a sample average value (0.037 min-1) or a value estimated first through coupled fitting across regions for each participant. Direct SRTM estimation and the Logan reference region graphical method were also evaluated. There were no significant group differences in CS volume, radiotracer uptake, or efflux (ps > 0.47). Each fitting method produced BPND estimates in close agreement with those derived from the 1TCM (subject R2s > 0.98, bias ND estimates from truncated scan data as short as 80 min produced values in excellent agreement with the data from the full 120 min scans (bias n = 5), this work suggests that accurate synaptic density quantification may be performed without blood sampling and with scan time under 90 minutes. If further validated, these simplified procedures for [18F]SynVesT-1 PET quantification can facilitate its application as a clinical research imaging technology and allow for larger study samples and include a broader scope of patients including those with neurodegenerative diseases.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.