SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Homogeneous-Multiset-CCA-Based Brain Covariation and Contravariance Connectivity Network Modeling.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng · 2023-09-11

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3310340PMID: 37682656

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Brain connectivity networks based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have expanded our understanding of brain functions in both healthy and diseased states. However, most current studies construct connectivity networks using averaged regional time courses with the strong assumption that the activities of voxels contained in each brain region are similar, ignoring their possible variations. Additionally, pairwise correlation analysis is often adopted with more attention to positive relationships, while joint interactions at the network level as well as anti-correlations are less investigated. In this paper, to provide a new strategy for regional activity representation and brain connectivity modeling, a novel homogeneous multiset canonical correlation analysis (HMCCA) model is proposed, which enforces sign constraints on the weights of voxels to guarantee homogeneity within each brain region. It is capable of obtaining regional representative signals and constructing covariation and contravariance networks simultaneously, at both group and subject levels. Validations on two sessions of fMRI data verified its reproducibility and reliability when dealing with brain connectivity networks. Further experiments on subjects with and without Parkinson's disease (PD) revealed significant alterations in brain connectivity patterns, which were further associated with clinical scores and demonstrated superior prediction ability, indicating its potential in clinical practice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.