Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveThe spatiotemporal gait changes in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) remain a treatment challenge and have variable responses to L-dopa and subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). The purpose of this study was to determine whether low-frequency STN-DBS (LFS; 60 Hz) elicits a differential response to high-frequency STN-DBS (HFS; 180 Hz) in spatiotemporal gait kinematics.MethodsAdvanced PD subjects with chronic STN-DBS were evaluated in both the OFF and ON medication states with LFS and HFS stimulation. Randomization of electrode contact pairs and frequency conditions was conducted. Instrumented Stand and Walk assessments were carried out for every stimulation/medication condition. LM-ANOVA was employed for analysis.ResultsTwenty-two PD subjects participated in the study, with a mean age (SD) of 63.9 years. Significant interactions between frequency (both LFS and HFS) and electrode contact pairs (particularly ventrally located contacts) were observed for both spatial (foot elevation, toe-off angle, stride length) and temporal (foot speed, stance, single limb support (SLS) and foot swing) gait parameters. A synergistic effect was also demonstrated with L-dopa and both HFS and LFS for right SLS, left stance, left foot swing, right toe-off angle, and left arm range of motion. HFS produced significant improvement in trunk and lumbar range of motion compared to LFS.ConclusionThe study provides evidence of synergism of L-dopa and STN-DBS on lower limb spatial and temporal measures in advanced PD. HFS and LFS STN-DBS produced equivalent effects among all other tested lower limb gait features. HFS produced significant trunk and lumbar kinematic improvements.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.