SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Traffic-related air pollution and Parkinson's disease in central California.

Environ Res · 2023-10-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117434PMID: 37858688

Check source for accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundPrior studies suggested that air pollution exposure may increase the risk of Parkinson's Disease (PD). We investigated the long-term impacts of traffic-related and multiple sources of particulate air pollution on PD in central California.MethodsOur case-control analysis included 761 PD patients and 910 population controls. We assessed exposure at residential and occupational locations from 1981 to 2016, estimating annual average carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations - a traffic pollution marker - based on the California Line Source Dispersion Model, version 4. Additionally, particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations were based on a nationwide geospatial chemical transport model. Exposures were assessed as 10-year averages with a 5-year lag time prior to a PD diagnosis for cases and an interview date for controls, subsequently categorized into tertiles. Logistic regression models were used, adjusting for various factors.ResultsTraffic-related CO was associated with an increased odds ratio for PD at residences (OR for T3 vs. T1: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.10; p-trend = 0.02) and workplaces (OR for T3 vs. T1: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.22, 3.00; p-trend 2.5 was also positively associated with PD at residences (OR for T3 vs. T1: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.15; p-trend ConclusionWe found that long-term modeled exposure to local traffic-related air pollution (CO) and fine particulates from multiple sources (PM2.5) at homes and workplaces in central California was associated with an increased risk of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.