Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionTranscranial focused ultrasound therapy (tcFUS) offers precise thermal ablation for treating Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. However, the manual fine-tuning of fiber tracking and segmentation required for accurate treatment planning is time-consuming and demands expert knowledge of complex neuroimaging tools. This raises the question of whether a fully automated pipeline is feasible or if manual intervention remains necessary.MethodsWe investigate the dependence on fiber tractography algorithms, segmentation approaches, and degrees of automation, specifically for essential tremor therapy planning. For that purpose, we compare an automatic pipeline with a manual approach that requires the manual definition of the target point and is based on FMRIB software library (FSL) and other open-source tools.ResultsOur findings demonstrate the high feasibility of automatic fiber tracking and the automated determination of standard treatment coordinates. Employing an automatic fiber tracking approach and deep learning (DL)-supported standard coordinate calculation, we achieve anatomically meaningful results comparable to a manually performed FSL-based pipeline. Individual cases may still exhibit variations, often stemming from differences in region of interest (ROI) segmentation. Notably, the DL-based approach outperforms registration-based methods in producing accurate segmentations. Precise ROI segmentation proves crucial, surpassing the importance of fine-tuning parameters or selecting algorithms. Correct thalamus and red nucleus segmentation play vital roles in ensuring accurate pathway computation.ConclusionThis study highlights the potential for automation in fiber tracking algorithms for tcFUS therapy, but acknowledges the ongoing need for expert verification and integration of anatomical expertise in treatment planning.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.