Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundCurrent pathophysiological models of Parkinson's disease (PD) assume a malfunctioning network being adjusted by the DBS signal. As various authors showed a main involvement of the cerebellum within this network, cerebello-cerebral fiber tracts are gaining special interest regarding the mediation of DBS effects.ObjectivesThe crossing and non-decussating fibers of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (c-DRTT/nd-DRTT) and the subthalamo-ponto-cerebellar tract (SPCT) are thought to build up an integrated network enabling a bidimensional communication between the cerebellum and the basal ganglia. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these tracts on clinical control of Parkinsonian tremor evoked by DBS.MethodsWe analyzed 120 electrode contacts from a cohort of 14 patients with tremor-dominant or equivalence-type PD having received bilateral STN-DBS. Probabilistic tractography was performed to depict the c-DRTT, nd-DRTT, and SPCT. Distance maps were calculated for the tracts and correlated to clinical tremor control for each electrode pole.ResultsA significant difference between "effective" and "less-effective" contacts was only found for the c-DRTT (p = 0.039), but not for the SPCT, nor the nd-DRTT. In logistic and linear regressions, significant results were also found for the c-DRTT only (pmodel logistic = 0.035, ptract logistic = 0,044; plinear = 0.027).ConclusionsWe found a significant correlation between the distance of the DBS electrode pole to the c-DRTT and the clinical efficacy regarding tremor reduction. The c-DRTT might therefore play a major role in the mechanisms of alleviation of Parkinsonian tremor and could eventually serve as a possible DBS target for tremor-dominant PD in future.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.