SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Remote at-home wearable-based gait assessments in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy compared to Parkinson's Disease.

BMC Neurol · 2023-12-11

DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03466-2PMID: 38082255

Open accessComparative Study; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundWearable sensors can differentiate Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) from Parkinson's Disease (PD) in laboratory settings but have not been tested in remote settings.ObjectivesTo compare gait and balance in PSP and PD remotely using wearable-based assessments.MethodsParticipants with probable PSP or probable/clinically established PD with reliable caregivers, still able to ambulate 10 feet unassisted, were recruited, enrolled, and consented remotely and instructed by video conference to operate a study-specific tablet solution (BioDigit Home ™) and to wear three inertial sensors (LEGSys™, BioSensics LLC, Newton, MA USA) while performing the Timed Up and Go, 5 × sit-to-stand, and 2-min walk tests. PSPRS and MDS-UPDRS scores were collected virtually or during routine clinical visits.ResultsBetween November, 2021- November, 2022, 27 participants were screened of whom 3 were excluded because of technological difficulties. Eleven PSP and 12 PD participants enrolled, of whom 10 from each group had complete analyzable data. Demographics were well-matched (PSP mean age = 67.6 ± 1.3 years, 40% female; PD mean age = 70.3 ± 1.8 years, 40% female) while disease duration was significantly shorter in PSP (PSP 14 ± 3.5 months vs PD 87.9 ± 16.9 months). Gait parameters showed significant group differences with effect sizes ranging from d = 1.0 to 2.27. Gait speed was significantly slower in PSP: 0.45 ± 0.06 m/s vs. 0.79 ± 0.06 m/s in PD (d = 1.78, p ConclusionOur study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring gait in PSP and PD remotely using wearable sensors. The study provides insight into digital biomarkers for both neurodegenerative diseases.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04753320, first posted Febuary 15, 2021.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.