SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Different associated factors of subjective cognitive complaints in patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2023-12-01

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1257799PMID: 38106525

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs), defined as cognitive decline reported by subjects or their informants, are common in the early stage of Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have shown a significant association between SCCs and non-motor features as well as objective cognitive decline in PD patients. However, the discrepancy in SCC prevalence and SCC-related factors between patients with early PD and those with advanced PD remains poorly understood. We recruited a total of 114 and 69 early PD patients and advanced PD patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for early PD and advanced PD patients. The prevalence of SCCs in the early PD and advanced PD groups was 60.5 and 68.1%, respectively. In the early PD group, the presence of SCCs in early PD participants was significantly associated with a higher nonmotor symptoms questionnaire (NMSQ) score (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00-1.10, p = 0.040). SCCs in the advanced PD group were related to lower attention scores (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.05-0.90, p = 0.043) and lower visuospatial/executive abilities scores (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.04-0.86, p = 0.032). The prevalence and SCC-related factors are distinct in early PD and advanced PD. These findings suggest that SCCs in PD patients with different disease statuses appear to have different related factors that may depend on different disease severities.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.