SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Gender gap in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: preliminary results of a retrospective study.

Neurosurg Rev · 2024-01-24

DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02290-7PMID: 38263479

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment of PD for both women and men. However, discussions have been reported about the impact of STN-DBS surgery in PD. The aim of our study is to identify differences between men and women in terms of pre- and post-DBS symptoms and try to explain the possible causes. In the current study, we evaluated the gender impact on STN-DBS in PD at the Department of Neurosurgery of University of Naples "Federico II" from 2013 to 2021. Motor and non-motor symptoms were evaluated. To compare the data before and after surgery and between the genders, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were performed. A total of 43 patients with PD were included; of them, 17 (39%) were female. Baseline evaluation revealed no gender differences in the age of onset (p = 0.87). Not significant differences were noted in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) pre-surgery score, but if we consider UPDRS subscores of motor examination, significant clinical improvement was reported in both male and female in terms of UPDRS pre- and post-surgery (p < 0.001). STN-DBS is a highly effective treatment for motor and non-motor symptoms of PD for both women and men but our study hints towards gender-specific outcomes in motor domains. Improving our knowledge in this field can allow us to implement strategies to identify new directions in the development of an adequate treatment of PD in terms of surgical intervention and in consideration of the gender.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.