SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association between inflammatory bowel disease and Parkinson's disease: a prospective cohort study of 468,556 UK biobank participants.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2024-01-15

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1294879PMID: 38288279

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are both chronic, progressive disorders. As such, given the inconclusive results of extensive research on the association between IBD and PD, our study intends to examine this relationship further using the UK Biobank database.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study using the Cox proportional hazards model, analyzing data from the UK Biobank to investigate the relationship between IBD and PD, following subjects until PD diagnosis, loss to follow up, death or study termination on 30 June, 2023.ResultsThe results show that IBD had no effect on the risk of PD (HR: 1.356, 95% CI: 0.941-1.955, p = 0.103), and the effect remained consistent in specific Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or unclassified IBD populations. In addition, after sensitivity analysis using propensity matching scores and excluding patients diagnosed with PD 5 or 10 years after baseline, IBD had no effect on the risk of PD. However, in the subgroup analysis, we found that in females (HR: 1.989, 95% CI: 1.032-3.835, p = 0.040), the polygenic risk score was highest (HR: 2.476, 95% CI: 1.401-4.374, p = 0.002), and having ulcerative colitis without hypertension (HR: 2.042, 95% CI: 1.128-3.697, p = 0.018) was associated with an increased risk of PD.ConclusionIn conclusion, over an average follow-up period of 13.93 years, we found no significant association between IBD and PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.