SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Predictors for early-onset psychotic symptoms in patients newly diagnosed with Parkinson's disease without psychosis at baseline: A 5-year cohort study.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2024-03-01

DOI: 10.1111/cns.14651PMID: 38432692

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

AimsTo investigate the risk factors for early-onset psychosis in Parkinson's disease (PD) in a cohort of patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative.MethodsLongitudinal data on motor and non-motor features, dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements were collected. The survival probability of psychotic symptoms, potential risk factors for psychosis development over a 5-year follow-up period, and the performance of the prediction model were evaluated.ResultsAmong the 338 newly diagnosed patients with PD, 83 developed psychotic symptoms. Gastrointestinal autonomic dysfunction, presence of probable rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder, and the ratio Aβ42: total-tau could independently predict onset of psychosis in PD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.157, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.022-1.309, p = 0.021, HR = 2.596, 95% CI 1.287-5.237, p = 0.008, and HR = 0.842, 95% CI 0.723-0.980, p = 0.027, respectively). The combined model integrating baseline clinical predictors, DAT imaging, and CSF measurements achieved better sensitivity than the clinical predictors alone (area under the curve = 0.770 [95% CI 0.672-0.868] vs. 0.714 [95% CI 0.625-0.802], p = 0.098).ConclusionWe identified clinical and CSF predictors of early-onset psychosis in patients with PD. Our study provides evidence and implications for prognostic stratification and therapeutic approaches for PD psychosis.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.