SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Time-resolved quantification of fine hand movements as a proxy for evaluating bradykinesia-induced motor dysfunction.

Sci Rep · 2024-03-04

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55862-4PMID: 38438484

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Bradykinesia is a behavioral manifestation that contributes to functional dependencies in later life. However, the current state of bradykinesia indexing primarily relies on subjective, time-averaged categorizations of motor deficits, which often yield poor reliability. Herein, we used time-resolved analyses of accelerometer recordings during standardized movements, data-driven factor analyses, and linear mixed effects models (LMEs) to quantitatively characterize general, task- and therapy-specific indices of motor impairment in people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) currently undergoing treatment for bradykinesia. Our results demonstrate that single-trial, accelerometer-based features of finger-tapping and rotational hand movements were significantly modulated by divergent therapeutic regimens. Further, these features corresponded well to current gold standards for symptom monitoring, with more precise predictive capacities of bradykinesia-specific declines achieved when considering kinematic features from diverse movement types together, rather than in isolation. Herein, we report data-driven, sample-specific kinematic profiles of diverse movement types along a continuous spectrum of motor impairment, which importantly, preserves the temporal scale for which biomechanical fluctuations in motor deficits evolve in humans. Therefore, this approach may prove useful for tracking bradykinesia-induced motor decline in aging populations the future.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.