Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundOlfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with more severe phenotypes, but trajectories of cognitive function, disease severity, and subdomains of quality-of-life measurements in patients with distinct olfactory profiles remain underexplored.ObjectiveTo analyze the influence of olfaction on trajectories of clinical parameters in patients with PD.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SubjectsFrom October 2016 to May 2021, the study tracked 58 participants over 3 years. Participants completed follow-up assessments using tools including the Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania's Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and the Chinese translation of the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39).MethodsParticipants were divided into anosmia (UPSIT ResultsDivergent cognitive trajectories were observed between groups. The anosmia group exhibited a faster cognitive decline (adjusted B [beta coefficient] = -1.8, p = 0.012) according to the interaction effect of olfaction and time on the MoCA score. The anosmia group exhibited no longitudinal correlation between cognition and olfactory function but showed correlations with age (rrm [coefficient of repeated measures correlation] = -0.464, p = 0.004) and disease duration (rrm = -0.457, p = 0.005). The non-anosmia group's UPSIT scores decreased over time (B = -2.3, p = 0.005) alongside a significant correlation with motor function (rrm = -0.479, p = 0.006).ConclusionThe anosmia group's accelerated cognitive decline correlated with age and disease duration, but not olfactory function, suggesting a poor cognitive outcome in this population despite the lack of longitudinal correlation between cognition and olfaction. The non-anosmia group exhibited progressive olfactory degradation and notable correlations between motor function and UPSIT scores, implying pathological accumulation in the olfactory structure and basal ganglia.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.