Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Postural instability is one of the most disabling motor signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) and often underlies an increased likelihood of falling and loss of independence. Current clinical assessments of PD-related postural instability are based on a retropulsion test, which introduces human error and only evaluates reactive balance. There is an unmet need for objective, multi-dimensional assessments of postural instability that directly reflect activities of daily living in which individuals may experience postural instability. In this study, we trained machine-learning models on insole plantar pressure data from 111 participants (44 with PD and 67 controls) as they performed simulated static and active postural tasks of activities that often occur during daily living. Models accurately classified PD from young controls (area under the curve (AUC) 0.99+/- 0.00), PD from age-matched controls (AUC 0.99+/- 0.01), and PD fallers from PD non-fallers (AUC 0.91+/- 0.08). Utilizing features from both static and active postural tasks significantly improved classification performances, and all tasks were useful for separating PD from controls; however, tasks with higher postural threats were preferred for separating PD fallers from PD non-fallers.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.